2014 (2) TMI 193

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri S.K. Menon, Counsel, for the Respondent. ORDER The applicants have preferred the present revision against the order dated 29-12-2010 passed by the 1st Additional Judge to the Court of Vth Additional Session Judge, Chhindwara in Criminal Revision No. 36/2009 whereby the impugned order dated 21-1-2009 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhindwara in Criminal Case No. 3509/1997 was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the parties dismissed the application and thereafter, a revision was filed by the prosecution. The revisionary Court vide the impugned order dated 29-12-2010 set aside the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chhindwara and allowed the application. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. 5. The learned counsel for the applicants has submitted in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....emsp;After considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the learned Additional Sessions Judge has rightly discussed the matter in detail. There is no illegality or perversity visible in the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge. The judgments and orders passed in the case of Smt. Rekha Rana (supra) ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lication of the prosecution appears to be a formality. The prosecution could prove the copies of the documents as mentioned under Section 36B of the Act and therefore, if the revisionary Court has accepted the application filed by the prosecution then no illegality or perversity has been done by the revisionary Court. 8. On the basis of the aforesaid discussion since there is no basis by w....