Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1997 (4) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Act, 1948 are directed against a common order dated November 15, 1994, passed by the Trade Tax Tribunal, Moradabad, disposing of the dealer's second appeals under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the assessment year 1978-79. 2.. I have heard Sri U.K. Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the revisionist, and Sri Bharat Ji Agarwal, Senior Advocate, assisted by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion relates to the refund of Rs. 1,18,033.56 relating to the assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act. 5. The assessee-respondent is a manufacturer of rectified spirit, country made liquor, and Indian made foreign liquor. The assessing officer enhanced the turnover under the U.P. Trade Tax Act taking into account the excess loss of molasses and some other matters. The Tribunal on a consid....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ited by the assessee was declined to be refunded because of section 29-A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act. This view was upheld by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal, however, directed the refund. 7.. Section 29-A, as introduced by section 15 of the U.P. Sales Tax (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1971, was declared unconstitutional by this Court. The State took the matter in appeal before ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....quent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Kasturi Lal Harlal v. State of U.P. [1987] 64 STC 1; 1987 UPTC 135. In the latter case, the honourable Supreme Court was dealing with section 29-A, as introduced by the Amendment Act of 1969 which stood repealed by the Amendment Act of 1971. It was section 29-A, as introduced by the 1971 Act that was declared unconstitutional by the honourable Sup....