2013 (12) TMI 1203

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to as the 'Act)for opinion to this Court. "Whether, on the facts of the case, the Income-tax Tribunal was justified in law in holding and also (sic.) whether there was any material for its finding that the cash credit in the name of Sri Ram Kumar was not proved (sic.)?" 2. The facts giving rise to the present reference are that M/S Gopalji Ambika Prasad, Azamgarh (the assessee) filed it's Income-tax Return on 31.10.1977 for the Assessment Year 1977-78 in the capacity of registered firm showing an income of Rs. 55,088/-, which was revised on 27.08.1979 showing an income of Rs. 54,593/- The Assessing Officer, during assessment, found that there was credit of Rs. 25,000/- in the name of Sri Ram Kumar on 29.07.1976, in the books of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d in-genuine entry. On these findings the appeal was allowed and order of CIT (A) was set aside. 3. We have heard Sri Rakesh Kumar for the assessee and Sri Shambhu Chopra, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue. A perusal of the order of Assessing Officer shows that Sri Ram Kumar was examined by the Assessing Officer and he had also filed copy of his bank account, which proved that Ram Kumar was having a bank account in his name, at the time of advancing loan to the assessee he was having sufficient money in his account from where he had credited money to the assessee through cheque and this amount was repaid by the assessee to Sri Ram Kumar through bank draft. These transactions have been disbelieved for the reasons (i) Sri Ram....