Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2013 (12) TMI 993

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to the non-resident from the indirect transfer of 49% share in the India Company, embedded in the sale consideration for acquisition of 100% shares of the foreign company and thereby directing the Assessing Officer not to treat the assessee in default under section 195 of the Act read with sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act. 3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee is a resident Indian company which was incorporated in 1955 as Tata Press Limited. The assessee acquired 100% stake in a company called M/s. Keyword Group Limited, a U.K. based publishing company. Equity shares of Keyword Group Limited were held by two U.K. resident citizens, namely, Mr. Alan Rodwell (700 shares holding to 70% stake) and Mr. Stephen Joh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld that the primary motive for acquisition of Keyword Group Limited was acquisition of shares of Cepha Imaging Private Limited. The A.O. also called for the balance sheet of Keyword Group Limited and noticed that it was incurring heavy losses. But for the investments held in Cepha Imaging Private Limited, the business of Keyword Group Limited was found to be loss making and liability imposing. In this background of facts, the A.O. reached the conclusion that the assessee acquired the shares of Keyword Group Limited mainly to acquire the stake in Cepha Imaging Private Limited. In the order passed u/s 201 read with section 195, the Assessing Officer held that since the assessee-company failed to deduct tax at source from income chargeable to ....