1997 (12) TMI 624
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Petitioner was granted registration certificate under the abovesaid two Acts by virtue of which it was liable to pay tax with effect from May 18, 1995. The Assessing Authority-cum-Excise and Taxation Officer, Karnal created a demand of tax in the sum of Rs. 2,76,034 against the petitioner. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner filed appeal before the Joint....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....venue Act. Prayer of the petitioner in this petition therefore is that respondentauthorities may be directed not to insist for payment of the tax demanded, during the pendency of the appeal before respondent No. 3. 3.. The appeal of the petitioner challenging the order of the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner refusing to entertain the appeal in the absence of prior payment of tax is pendin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....titioner and pending before the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner be ordered to be heard on its own merits in the absence of prior payment of tax. 4.. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case especially the question of liability of the petitioner to pay tax being under consideration in the pending appeal, we direct the J....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI