TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
1990 (9) TMI 339
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e order dated December 30, 1983 as at annexure E. 2.. Exercising the suo motu powers of revision under section 22-A of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka, Bangalore, respondent herein called upon the appellant-assessee to show cause why the orders of the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals), Bangal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ble turnover in the sales. Similarly he found that the books of accounts disclosed collection of sales tax on certain items while in respect of other items no sales tax had been collected though sales tax was liable to be collected on all such sales. He further found that the assessee had deducted the sales from the opening stock. Therefore, the turnover of sales shown was less the opening stock w....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....order as at annexure B was that the appeal came to be allowed fully. In other words, though the books of accounts did not reflect truly and faithfully the turnover of the assessee, yet the appellate authority directed the same to be accepted as the proper books of accounts or to put it in otherwords, the turnover disclosed in the prescribed form was directed to be accepted even with reference to t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....en of course the assessing authority's order automatically gets revived. Therefore, the Commissioner cannot have jurisdiction to set aside the order of the assessing authority which had merged in the order of the appellate authority. To that extent, the order is liable to be set aside by us without any further discussion. 8.. But we find that there are certain observations made by the Commissione....