2013 (11) TMI 711

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hi, Superintendent (A.R.) PER : P R Chandrasekharan The appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal no. BR(49)49/STC/2005 dated 11.11.2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-I. 2. The facts relevant to the case are as follows:- The appellant M/s Acharya Jialal Vasant Sangeet Niketan (Ajivasan Hall) rented out their premises at Ajivasan Hall, Juhu Tara Road, M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....from the same, the appellant preferred an appeal before the appellate authority, who mechanically confirmed the demand and rejected the appeal. Hence the appellant is before us. 3. The appellant contends that in the show-cause notice demand was not quantified nor the period specified. The show-cause notice is bad in law and subsequent action taken by the department from such a show-cause notice....