2009 (12) TMI 848
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r. S. Chandrasekaran For the Respondents : Mr. Haja Nazirudeen, SGP JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. Raviraja Pandian, J.) The tax case appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of the Joint Commissioner dated 25.05.1998 made in F1 5489/96 and SMR No.314/96 restoring penalty under Section 12(3)(b) of the TNGST Act read with Section 9(2-A) of the CST Act. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y this Court in the above said Judgment, wherein it was held thus:- "....7. Though other sub-sections of Section 12 were amended by the State Legislature subsequently to the date of the Judgment in the case of Jayaraj Nadar & Sons (1971) 28 STC 700 (SC),sections 12(1) and 12(2) have remained in the same form. The legislative intention therefore, except during the period December 3, 1979 to May ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI