TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2013 (11) TMI 73
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the judgment and order dated 19.05.2006, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow in ITA No.333/Luc/2003, for the assessment year 1998-99. On 17.01.2007, a Coordinate Bench of this Court has admitted the appeal on the following substantial questions of law:- "1 Whether on the facts and in the peculiar circumstances of the case the notice u/s 148 was not ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Kuber Group of Companies in the capacity of GM, Eastern Region. The assessee has filed his return of income declaring income of Rs.12,59,728/- On 22.03.2001, a notice was issued for the deficiency. After considering the submissions of the assessee, the AO has completed the assessment at the total income of Rs.36,35,740/- under Section 147 of the Act. The CIT(A) by following the ratio laid down in ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he instant case, the assessee has voluntarily filed his return under Section 139 of the Act. On 23.06.2000, a notice under Section 139(9) was issued for the removal of the defects. These defects were not removed. So, again, a notice was sent on 25.10.2002. Ultimately, the defects were removed. But, there is no reference to this effect in the assessment order passed by the AO for the assessment yea....