Withdraws anti-dumping duty on vitrified tiles exported by a couple of Chinese firms
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mported into India, the designated authority vide its final findings No. 37/1/2001-DGAD, dated the 4th February, 2003, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 5th February, 2003, had come to the conclusion that- (a) the subject goods have been exported to India from the subject countries below its normal value resulting in dumping; (b) the Indian industry had suffered material injury; (c) the injury had been caused cumulatively by the imports from the subject countries; and had considered it necessary to impose definitive anti-dumping duty, on all imports of vitrified and porcelain tiles from the subject countries in order to remove the injury to the domestic industry; And whereas on the basis ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of aforesaid recommendation of the designated authority, the Central Government had ordered, vide notification No. 102/2004-Customs dated 30th September 2004, published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, dated the 30th September 2004 [G.S.R. 650(E), dated the 30th September 2004] that, pending the outcome of the said review by the designated authority, the subject goods, produced by M/s Southern Building Materials and Sanitary Co. Ltd., Qingyan City, People's Republic of China, and exported by M/s New Zhong Yuan Ceramics Import & Export Co. Ltd., Guangdong, People's Republic of China when imported into India, shall be subjected to provisional assessment till the review is completed; And whereas ....