Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessments u/s 147 after taking into account various observations of the High Courts and Supreme Court. In this connection attention is invited to Board's letters F.No. 64/21/67-IT(inv.) dated 21.1.1967, F.No.5/229/69-IT(Inv.) dated 27.10.1969 and F.No. 289/66/71-IT(Inv.) dated 12.1.1972. Inspite of these instructions it is seen that proposals for reopening assessments received by the Board from....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....im from the latter from which it appeared that certain creditors were name lenders and the loan transactions were bogus and that therefore proper investigation regarding the loans taken by the assessee was necessary. He did not mention in the report the material he had before him and his reason for coming to the conclusion that this was fit case for issuing notice u/s. 148. On this report the Comm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that there was a case for investigating the truth of the alleged transactions was not the same thing as saying that there were reasons for the issue of the notice. The Commissioner had mechanically accorded permission. The important safeguards provided in sections 147 and 151 were lightly treated by the Officer and the Commissioner. The Income-tax Officer could not have had reason to believe that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....this sum or at least part of which represents income which has escaped assessment". The Supreme Court's observations in this case were as follows:- "The two reasons given for the belief formed by the I.T.O. hopelessly failed to satisfy the requirements of section 34(IA). The so-called reasons were stated to be beliefs thus leading to an obvious self-contradiction. There was no material or fa....