Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice — FREE 🎉 ✕

150 credits · 30 days

• Basic Search → 1 Credit
• Advanced Search → 3 Credits
• Drafter → 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(≈ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Raising of protective demands consequent to CERA objection – modification of circular 5/83-CX6 dated 10.3.83 – reg.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to draw your attention to Board's circular No. 5/83-CX6 dated 10.3.83 issued from F. No. 210/28/81-CX6 and circular No. 444/10/99-CX dated 12.3.99 issued from F. No. 210/1/99-CX6 wherein it has been, inter alia, directed that immediately on receipt of objection from CERA, demand-cum-show cause notice should be issued without any loss of time even if the Central Excise officers do not agree with ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng on the field formations. These instructions/circulars too have legal backing as these are part of the technical functions which are performed under the statute by Board. Therefore, the raising of protective demands contrary to Board's circulars/instructions shows inherent inconsistency. The Apex Court has also held in the case of Ranadey Micronutrients vs Collector of Central Excise that "…....