Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 250

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hn 1. The applicant was engaged in running a Center for providing coaching in Spoken English, in the name of 'Speak English'. Revenue was of the view that such coaching was taxable under entry for commercial and training under entry 65 (105) (zzo) of the Finance Act, 1994. The applicant was initially paying service tax during the period 2006-07 but later stopped payment of service tax. Since the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....roduced in the year 2003, the Tax Research Unit had issued circular No.59/8/2003-ST dt. 20.6.03 clarifying that the foreign language institutes will be eligible for exemption under notification 9/03-ST and that was the reason why they stopped paying tax. He submits that since there is a circular issued by CBEC in favour of the applicant, appeal may be admitted without any predeposit. He also relie....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s a person taking such training to get employment. He also relies on the Tribunals stay order in the case of Col's Calibre Vs CCE Coimbatore - 2011 (24) STR 427 (Tri.-Chennai). 5. Considered the submissions on both sides. Prima facie, we find merit in the argument of Ld. Advocate that when there was a clarification issued by the Board, it is not proper to invoke extended period of limitation for....