2013 (8) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e disposed of by this common order for the sake of convenience. 3. We take up the appeal in the case of Nalin P. Shah (Individual), being I.T.A. No.4780/M/ 2010 for our consideration and the decision will apply mutatis-mutandis to other two appeals. 4. The issue raised in this appeal is against confirmation of penalty of Rs.68,00,000 imposed by the Assessing Officer AO u/s.271(1)(c) of the Incone-tax Act, 1961(Act). 5. Facts in brief are that assessee filed his return of income declaring total income of Rs.1.48 Crores and assessment was completed u/s.143(3) on 30.10.2006 at a total income of Rs. 1.52 Crores. During the course of assessment proceedings, AO noticed that under the head 'long term capital gain', assessee had declared l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....see that provisions of section 10(33) were inserted to provide tax relief to ailing investors of US 64 was not factually correct, that any loss arising out of such asset was to be ignored and no claim of set off of loss/carry forward of the same could be allowed, that loss from a source which is exempt was not an admissible adjustment against any income, that the despite knowing this fact, the assessee had made the claim to set off/carry forward of capital loss on account of US 64, that the income did not always include loss as claimed by the assessee, that it was an established legal position that loss from a source which was exempt was not permitted to be set off/carry forward,that the assessee had claimed the set off/carry forward of los....