Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (6) TMI 63

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed Company Judge had also heard Prasar Bharti, though not a party, notice was issued to Prasar Bharti also. The counsels have been heard. 2. The appellant Company sought its voluntary winding up, pleading that it was engaged in the business inter alia of telecasting T.V. Serials/Programms and had entered into an agreement with Prasar Bharti; that it suffered net loss of Rs. 41,90,576/-; that disputes also arose with Prasar Bharti which are subject matter of arbitration; that since 11th March, 1999 no business had been done; that in the circumstances the Directors of the appellant Company in the meeting held on 5th September, 2006 resolved for winding up of the appellant Company; that an Extraordinary General Meeting of the shareholders was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the appellant Company to, notwithstanding winding up, continue to contest the arbitration proceedings and not to leave the same to the Official Liquidator. The appellant Company has also offered to, if permitted to be wound up, give up the counter claim against Prasar Bharti in the said arbitration. Affidavits of the only eight shareholders of the appellant Company in support of the appeal have also been filed. It is also contended that there is no prospect of the appellant Company in doing any other business. It is also argued that once the procedure prescribed in law for voluntary winding up has been fulfilled, the Court should not come in the way. Reliance is placed on Surendra Kumar Pareek v. Shree Guru Nanak Oils (P.) Ltd. [1995] 82 ....