2013 (4) TMI 456
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....g out of an order dated 28.04.2011 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh (for short "the Tribunal") pertaining to the year 2007-08. The Revenue has claimed the following question of law: " i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Tribunal was right in law in allowing an adoption of Net Profit rate of 7% as ruled by the CIT(A) in contrast to the Net profit r....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rs, which made him adopt the net profit rate of 12%. Hence, the order of the ITAT is arbitrary and perverse." Learned Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue for the reason that net profit rate of 8% was applied in the case of assessee in the year 2005-06 and 2006-07, therefore, in the present assessment year, the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the order passed by the C....