Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (2) TMI 326

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....7, 2009-10 and 2008-09 are concerned.   2. Writ Petition No.24101 of 2012 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent in TRC Nos.185 to 187 relating to the assessment year 2006-07 to 2009-10 and quash the letter dated 22.8.2012 and direct the first respondent to lift the order of attachment of immovable property in respect of 25 flats is concerned.   3. By consent, all four writ petitions are taken up together for final disposal.   4. Heard Mr.R.Sivaraman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in all four writ petitions; Mr.T.Pramodkumar Chopta, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 in all writ petitions and Mr.N.Srinivasan, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the third respondents in W.P.Nos.22913 to 22915 of 2012.   5. The petitioner undertook an housing project and as a consequence to the development of the project and the profit derived thereon, they sought the benefit of Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, more particularly Sub Clause 10, which reads as follows:-   "Deduction in respect of profits and gains from certain industri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd which has a minimum area of one acre:   Provided that nothing contained in clause (a) or clause (b) shall apply to a housing project carried out in accordance with a scheme framed by the Central Government or a State Government for reconstruction or redevelopment of existing buildings in areas declared to be slum areas under any law for the time being in force and such scheme is notified by the Board in this behalf;   (c) The residential unit has a maximum built-up area of one thousand square feet where such residential unit is situated within the city of Delhi or Mumbai or within twenty-five kilometres from the municipal limits of these cities and one thousand and five hundred square feet at any other place;   (d) the built-up area of the shops and other commercial establishments included in the housing project does not exceed three percent of the aggregate built-up area of the housing project or five thousand square feet, whichever is higher;   (e) not more than one residential unit in the housing project is allotted to any person not being an individual; "   6. Special deduction from tax was sought under Chapter VI-A of the Tamil Nadu I....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ility for payment of tax whatsoever consequent to the order giving effect to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order dated 22.11.2012.   10. Mr.Pramodhkumar Chopda, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 in all the writ petitions states that the time limit for filing a tax appeal is not over and therefore, the demand notice should continue in terms of Section 225(2) and (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and it reads as follows:-   225. Stay of proceedings in pursuance of certificate and amendment or cancellation thereof (1) x x x (2) Where the order giving rise to a demand of tax for which a certificate has been drawn up is modified in appeal or other proceeding under this Act, and, as a consequence thereof, the demand is reduced but the order is the subject-matter of further proceeding under this Act, the Tax Recovery Officer shall stay the recovery of such part of the amount specified in the certificate as pertains to the said reduction for the period for which the appeal or other proceeding remains pending.   (3) Where a certificate has been drawn up and subsequently the amount of the outstanding demand is reduced as a result of an ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and sale of immovable property contained in Order 21 of the C.P.C. dealing with execution of decrees passed by civil courts. However, in Order 21 of the C.P.C., a provision similar to Rule 56 of Second Schedule is not to be found. Rule 60 provides for an application to set aside sale of immovable property being made by defaulter or an interested person on his depositing the specified amount within 30 days from the date of sale. Rule 61 deals with application to set aside sale of immovable property on the ground of non-service of notice on the defaulter under the Schedule or on the ground of material irregularity in publishing or conducting the sale. Under Rule 62 a sale may be set aside on an application by the purchaser on the ground that the defaulter had no saleable interest in the property sold. The prescribed time limit within which the application can be made under Rule 60, 61 or 62 is 30 days from the date of sale. Where no application is made for setting aside the sale or such an application having been made is disallowed, the Tax Recovery Officer shall make an order confirming the sale and thereupon the sale shall become absolute. On a sale of immovable property becoming a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Tax Recovery Officer, would fall to the ground for want of confirmation.   6. In the case at hand the sale was held on 11.1.1980. No application was filed for setting aside the sale either by the assessee or by the auction purchaser or by anyone interested in the property. On expiry of 30 days from the date of the sale the Tax Recovery Officer could have passed an order confirming the sale. However, the Tax Recovery Officer was injuncted by the writ of civil court from confirming the sale. The interim order issued by the civil court ceased to operate on 12.1.1998 whereafter an order of confirmation was passed on 25.3.1998 by the Tax Recovery Officer ignoring, or unmindful of, the important event which had taken place in between. Before 25.3.1998, the demand against the assessee admittedly stood reduced to nil. This fact was in the notice of Income-tax Officer as well as the Commissioner of Income Tax. Attention of the Income-tax Officer as also the Tax Recovery Officer was also invited by the firm M/s. UPCC through its communication dated 22.11.1996 (Annexure P- 6). On 16.1.1997, the counsel for the assessee had specifically called upon the Income Tax Officer who had rai....