TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2013 (2) TMI 187
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rder of assessment passed under Section 25 of the KVAT Act (hereinafter referred to as 'Act' for short) for the assessment years 2006- 2007. According to the petitioner, they are dealers in iron and scrap, registered under the Act. It is stated that the 13th respondent is an agent of BSNL for the sale of scrap. Being an agent of their Principals, 13th respondent will negotiate with prospective purchasers and if successful, will issue delivery orders such as Ext.P1 series. On that basis, BSNL will issue invoice, collect value and tax and on that basis, will deliver the materials sold. 3. It is stated that on that basis, petitioner purchased substantial quantity of scrap from various offices of the BSNL and claimed Input Tax Credit u....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fects sales. As per the return filed for the period from 4/06 to 3/07, the dealer has purchased the goods from M/s.MSTC Ltd, Chennai. The input claimed by the dealer is inadmissible as it was not supported by proper tax invoice in the prescribed from. In the reply filed to the notice, the dealer maintains the view that the purchase is from BSNL and requested further time to produce the tax invoice. Accordingly the dealer was given 10 days time to prove his case. But he could not prove the eligibility of returns and purchase statement filed. As per letter dated 13.12.06 of the dealer, which is seen filed in response to a notice from the CTO, Mavelikkara it is categorically stated that the dealers are effecting purchases from M/s. MSTC Ltd a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sued by Secretary to Government, where it was directed thus:- "It has been brought to the notice of the Government that many of the Government departments, Local Authorities and Autonomous Bodies have failed to comply with the statutory requirements even though the law was implemented with effect from 1.4.2005 and also that such departments fail to issue the declaration in form No.21J to the buying dealers with the result that they (buying dealers) are denied the benefit of refund of input tax allowed to them by the statute. Even though Government have issued circular instruction to see that such Government departments, local authorities and autonomous bodies should file application for registration under the above statutory provisions not....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....plicable only in respect of sales effected by the Government departments, local authorities and autonomous bodies. Admittedly, BSNL is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and a company cannot be described as an autonomous body to be covered by the circular relied on by learned counsel for the petitioner. Here again, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that when the Government has chosen to extend the benefit to the sales effected by the Government departments, local bodies and autonomous bodies, there is no reason to deny similar benefit to the petitioner who has effected purchases from a Government company. Although prima facie, learned counsel may be justified in this contention, still the quest....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ommercial Taxes clarifies the position in favour of the petitioner, there is no reason why Ext.P9 should not be suitably modified. 12. WP(C) 37781 of 2010 was filed by the petitioner challenging Ext.P3 revenue recovery notice which was issued for recovering the tax due under Ext.P9 in WP(C) No.30329 of 2008. 13. In the light of the above discussion, I dispose of these two writ petitions with the following directions. 1) That it will be open to the petitioner to move the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes for a clarification of Circular No.18433/B1/2008/TD dated 30th August, 2008. If the petitioner moves for such a clarification and obtains a favourable order, it will be open to him to produce the same before the first respondent. 2) On su....