2012 (10) TMI 913

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri J. Nagori, A.R. Per : Mr. B.S.V. Murthy; Refund claim for Rs. 65,854/- has been rejected on the ground that appellant s claim for refund of service tax paid on various services including Terminal Handling Charges used in respect of goods exported, is not admissible. 2. Learned counsel on behalf of the appellant submits that appellant is challenging rejection of refund claim only in res....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as specifically mentioned when Notification No. 17/2009 was issued amending the Notification No. 41/2007-ST and therefore, decision holding for the earlier period refund is not admissible, is legal and proper.   4. I have considered the submissions made by both sides. I am unable to accept the view that the observations in the order of this Tribunal in the case of Macro Polymers Pvt. Limit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d the stand taken by the appellants that it is covered under port service whereas for terminal handling charges he considers that the same is not relating to port service. In fact the department could have easily verified whether THC and REPO charges were actually charges paid towards service tax for port services or not since Expressing Shipping and Logistics clearly says that whatever they have ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce to show the category of service under which service tax has been paid. Neither the appellant nor the Revenue has undertaken this exercise. Therefore, as regards service tax on bill lading charges, the matter is remanded to the original adjudicating authority before whom the appellants may produce evidence to show under which category the payment of service tax has actually been made by the ser....