2012 (10) TMI 189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en filed by the applicant M/s. Coromandel Agrico Pvt. Ltd. A-73, Industrial Area, Sikandrabad (UP) against the Order-in-Appeal No. 252/CE/APPL/NOIDA/2009 dated 18-9-2009 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Customs & Central Excise, Noida, in the matter arising out of Order-in-Original No. 44/R/AC/N-V/08-09 passed by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise, Division-V, Noida. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... said goods were exported under Bond. Vide the above referred claim the Applicant claimed refund of duty paid by M/s. Weir Minerals (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, the manufacturer of the said goods. The Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise, Division-IV, Noida rejected the refund claim application vide the impugned order holding that the refund is not admissible to the Applicant under Rule 18 of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....no dispute regarding the Export of goods. The rebate claim was filed before the wrong authority under bona fide belief, within the time prescribed and this is merely an unintentional procedural lapse on the part of the Applicant. It is the view of the Government of India that where the export is not in dispute and there is a mere infraction of the procedural conditions of the Notification, then th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....payment of duty, which the Applicant failed to do. The Appellate Authority upheld the impugned Order-in-Original. 8. Government observes that applicant (in this case merchant exporter) has exported the goods manufactured by M/s. Weir Minerals (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore. As per provisions of Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.) the rebate claim is to be filed with the Assistant Commission....