Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (10) TMI 106

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent. [Order per : Mathew John, Member (T)]. -  M/s. Jaypee Palace Hotel, Fatehabad Road, Agra (here-in- after called "the party") are engaged in providing services of (i) Mandap Keeper (ii) Health Club & Fitness Centre Service (iii) Beauty Treatment Service (iv) Dry Cleaner (v) Convention Service (vi) Internet Cafe (vii) Outdoor Catering (viii) Transport of good by Road Service. The party i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....les, 2004. I order for appropriation of the amount of Rs. 1,25,330/- deposited by the party along with interest out of the disallowed amount of Rs. 1,26,741/- (III)   I also confirm the demand of Service Tax of Rs. 1,27,869/- which was short paid by the party by way of abatement of 40% during March, 2006 under Section 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994. (IV)   I also confirm the dema....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....73/-. 5. The appellants are contesting the demand on account of denial of abatement of 40% from gross receipt for assessee providing both Mandap Keeper Service and Catering Service. The Revenue's case is that the appellants have availed Cenvat credit and hence they are not eligible for such abatement. The appellants contest that they have not taken any Cenvat credit on inputs or input servic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....be applicable for utilizing such credit. 7. Sub-rules (1), (2), (3) of Rule (6) deal with the obligations of an assessee providing exempted and dutiable services. These sub- rules are to be seen in the context that credit of inputs used in relation to exempted output service is not allowed to be taken. But in spite of this if an assessee takes such what is to be done is prescribed in the sai....