2012 (9) TMI 308

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For Respondents : Mr.V.Sundareswaran   O R D E R   Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.   2. It has been stated that the petitioner firm was involved in the business of construction of civil foundations, for the erection of communication towers, by M/s.Bharat Sanchar Nigam, Limited during th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....8, demanding service tax, as well as interest and also proposing to levy penalty. In the said notice it was also stated that the service tax and interest, already paid by the petitioner, may be appropriated.   3. It has been further stated that the petitioner had given a written explanation for the said show cause notice. The first respondent had proceeded to pass an Order-in-Original, dat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... over three months. Accordingly, he had passed the order, dated 27.1.2011, rejecting the appeal filed by the petitioner, as time barred.   4. It has been further stated that the petitioner had preferred an appeal before the third respondent challenging the order of the second respondent, dated 27.1.2011. The third respondent had passed a cryptic order, dated 21.10.2011, dismissing the appe....