Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2012 (9) TMI 263

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... -<br>Income Tax<br>S.J. VAZIFDAR, & M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for the Petitioners. &nbsp; Mr. Tejveer Singh with Ms. Padma Divakar, Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Respondents &nbsp; P.C.: &nbsp; 1. Writ Petition No.1629 of 2012 is, with the consent of the parties, placed on board and considered for admission. &nbsp; 2. Rule. 3. With the consent of the parties, the Writ Petitions....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... A further Transfer Petition, being Transfer Petition (C) No.703 of 2011 was filed in respect of certain other similar Writ Petitions. The same was disposed of by an order dated 3rd February, 2012. The Supreme Court observed that looking to the large number of matters pending in various High Courts and since the question related to the virus of the said provisions, it would be more convenient and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessments were still pending although such benefit will be available to the assessees whose assessments have already been concluded. In other words, in this type of substantive amendment, retrospective operation can be given only if it is for the benefit of the assessee but not in a case where it affects even a fewer section of the assessee. 27. We, accordingly, quash the impugned amendment o....