Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (7) TMI 545

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct, 1961, impugns the order dated June 17, 2011, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ("the Tribunal" for short) in the case of Mascomptel India Ltd. The appeal related to the assessment year 2006-07.   2. The requirement to serve a notice under section 143(2) of the Act was examined in CIT v. Lunar Diamonds Ltd. [2006] 281 ITR 1 (Delhi) and it was held that notice under the said se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... however, not stated in the assessment order. The assessment was made ex parte/best judgment assessment order was passed.   4. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal have held that the aforesaid service by the affixture was not valid. The findings of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal are that the assessee had mentioned a different address in the r....