Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (6) TMI 12

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s to the assessment year 2003-04. The assessee is the Esconet Services Ltd. and in the return of income it claimed deduction on account of write off of bad debts of Rs. 1,52,28,630/- under Section 36(i)(vii) read with Section 36(2)i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The Assessing Officer disallowed the entire amount on the ground that the assessee did not make sufficient efforts to recover the m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iled before the Tribunal it was found that the total debit of service charges amounting to Rs. 2,48,87,291/- included an amount of Rs. 92,27,630/- charged on 27.1.2003 and this entry was reversed as amount written off in the ledger account itself. The Tribunal therefore, held that the assessee was able to show that an amount of Rs. 92,27,630/- had earlier been taken into account as income earned b....