Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2011 (8) TMI 616

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty levied under section 271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?   2. In the present case, the premises of Mr. Kiran Shah, a director of the assessee-company was searched by the income-tax authorities. During the course of search, incriminating documents regarding unaccounted expenditure incurred by the said Kiran Shah were seized. In the proce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellate Tribunal and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty by recording a finding of fact in para. 13 of its order to the effect that the assessee has neither received any amount by way of loan nor received any deposit and it is the director of the company who had utilized his undisclosed income for and on behalf of the assessee. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has recorded a f....