2011 (5) TMI 602
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Appellant s contention is that the goods Katha produced by it is not dutiable goods and there shall be no duty of such goods and the adjudication order passed levying duty and redemption fine as well as penalty on the appellant is unjustified. 2. Shri Pawan kumar Jain, Director of the company who faced penalty of Rs.10,000/- whether has filed any appeal is not before us. 3. Submi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iod 2004-05 and 2005-06. We have gone through those entries. We found that the Revenue s stand for the tariff entry remains uncontroverted for the nature of goods manufactured. Therefore, duty liability arises under Central Excise Act, 1944 and that is confirmed. Next pleading made by learned Consultant is that in the event Tribunal come to the conclusion that there shall be levy, the appellant sh....