2011 (1) TMI 1111

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  J U D G M E N T   Ramachandran Nair, J.   Heard Shri.T.M.Sreedharan, learned counsel appearing for the assessee, and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent.   2. The first question raised pertains to the assessee's status in which it is assessed that is as an AOP, against the claim of the assessee that it is a partnership firm. However, it is seen that phot....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Commissioner of Income Tax, reported in 2008(3) KLT 813. In view of the failures covered by Section 144, which are established beyond doubt, we do not think the assessee is entitled to be assigned in the status of a firm. Consequently, we reject this claim.   3. The next ground pertains to the addition of Rs.3,07,159/- sustained by the Tribunal. After going through the orders of the Tribun....