Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (7) TMI 745

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....77              Penalty imposed under Section 78 S. Tax    Edu. Cess             Shed Cess Oct. 2006 to March 2007                2,28,118/-                                                       4,562/- -                                                   &nb....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nbsp;   3,55,666/-                                                          7,114/- -                                                  3,63,465/-             &n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... para 3.5 of the order of the original authority, wherein the Assistant Commissioner rendered a finding that the alleged intention of evasion was not sustainable. He further submits that the original authority had imposed a penalty of Rs. 3,63,465/- under Section 76 of the Act, which was in excess of the penalty provided under Section 76 even if the assessee was held liable to pay penalty @ Rs. 200/- per day. According to him, in view of the finding of absence of any intention to evade service tax, penalty in excess of Rs. 100/- per day was not justifiable under Section 76 of the Act. He also submits that for the same reason, equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 78 and a penalty of Rs. 2000/- imposed under Section 77 are also not s....