2010 (4) TMI 818
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Shri S. Udayakumar, S.C.G.S.C., for the Respondent. [Order]. - Mr. S. Udayakumar, learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel takes notice for respondents. With the consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has come as against the order of the CESTAT directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 2.00 crores within ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of the petitioner-company has stated in his statement that the records of the earlier period have been destroyed. Taking into account the financial hardship pleaded by the petitioner and the amount of Rs. 52.00 lakhs paid by the petitioner, the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 2.00 crores. 4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out that as against the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y the petitioner before the Tribunal. Having regard to the prima facie case made that the assessment itself is made based on the electricity consumption and the fact that the subject matter of appeal before the Tribunal is as against the very same order on which the petitioner has also preferred an appeal before the Tribunal, I have no hesitation in granting the relief as prayed for. Accordingly, ....
TaxTMI