Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (4) TMI 818

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri S. Udayakumar, S.C.G.S.C., for the Respondent. [Order]. - Mr. S. Udayakumar, learned Senior Central Government Standing Counsel takes notice for respondents. With the consent of both sides, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner has come as against the order of the CESTAT directing the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 2.00 crores within ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the petitioner-company has stated in his statement that the records of the earlier period have been destroyed. Taking into account the financial hardship pleaded by the petitioner and the amount of Rs. 52.00 lakhs paid by the petitioner, the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 2.00 crores. 4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out that as against the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y the petitioner before the Tribunal. Having regard to the prima facie case made that the assessment itself is made based on the electricity consumption and the fact that the subject matter of appeal before the Tribunal is as against the very same order on which the petitioner has also preferred an appeal before the Tribunal, I have no hesitation in granting the relief as prayed for. Accordingly, ....