2011 (2) TMI 861

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Commissioner (Appeals) No.72/09 dt. 22.4.2009. Heard both sides. 2. Relevant facts, in brief, are that the premises of the appellants were visited by the officers on 23.1.2004 which revealed that appellants have manufactured and sold some quantity of unprocessed fabrics under the invoice of M/s.G.M.Textiles which was a fictitious, non-existent unit. The proprietor of the appellant firm adm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ustained, no option has been given by the authorities below to pay reduced penalty of 25% of the duty involved in terms of proviso to Section 11AC and, therefore, they should be given the option now to pay the concessional penalty. In this regard, he relies upon the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of K.P.Pouches (P) Ltd. Vs UOI reported in 2008 (228) ELT 31 (Del.). 4. Ld. ....