Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (3) TMI 628

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ses-see while submitting its income-tax return for the assessment year 2003-04 depicted the cost incurred towards the construction activity for a holiday resort by depicting the estimated cost thereof. It is apparent, that on the basis of the estimated cost, it was not possible for the Revenue to deter-mine the quantum of depreciation that had to be allowed to the respon-dent-assessee under sectio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....smissed by an order dated July 23, 2008.   It is apparent from the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tri-bunal dated July 23, 2008, that the issue in hand, namely, depreciation on the expenses incurred by the respondent-assessee on the construction of its holiday resort could not have been determined on the basis of any rough estimate. In order to afford an opportunity to the respon....