2011 (7) TMI 353
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., SDR for Revenue. Per: Mrs. Archana Wadhwa: Vide Stay Order No.S/720 to 722/WZB/AHD/2011, dt.8.4.11, the appellants were directed to deposit an amount of Rs.5 lakhs (Rupees Five Lakhs only) as a condition of hearing of their appeal. Ld. Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that an amount of Rs.2,73,486/- (Rupees Two Lakhs, Seventy Three Thousands, Four Hundreds and Eig....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Commissioner (Appeals) on 22.05.08. The appellants attended the hearing in those cases and as such it cannot be said that they were not aware of the passing of the impugned order. Explaining the same, ld. Advocate Shri Mayur Shroff, submits that they attended the hearing before Commissioner(Appeals) on 22.05.08. He draws my attention to the records of personal hearing obtained by the appellant und....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hearing for the appeal filed by the Revenue against said order was fixed by Commissioner(Appeals). The request made to Superintendent to supply a copy of the order so that they also can challenge the same before Commissioner(Appeals). Reminders to the said letter were also issued. 3. It is only ultimately the Superintendent vide letter dt.29.12.08 (received by the appellant on 12.01.09),....
TaxTMI