2011 (2) TMI 525

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ENTED BY : Ms. Sukriti Das, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri R.K. Verma, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, President (Oral)]. - Heard the Advocate for the appellants and the DR for the respondent. By the present application, the appellants are seeking stay in relation to the interest amount required to be deposited for compliance of Section 35F of the Cent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appellants had filed an application for stay being stay application No. 924 of 2009 which came to be disposed of by order dated 3-6-2010. While disposing of the stay application, it was specifically observed that "considering that the duty aspect has been paid in the manner indicated above, we direct waiver of pre-deposit of penalty during pendency of the appeal". Obviously, the requirement of dep....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to what could be the quantification of interest amount payable by the appellants. Being so, mere intimation of such quantification of interest cannot entitle the appellants to file another application under Section 35F of the Act. The communication of quantification of interest cannot give a new ground or material to justify fresh application under Section 35F of the said Act. Being so, we do not....