Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (3) TMI 488

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... waiver of pre-deposit of an amount of Rs.12,13,90,286/- demanded from them being cenvat credit utilized by them during the period April, 2005 to September, 2006 violating Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004(CCR) to pay service tax. The application also covers various penalties imposed on the appellant including an amount of Rs.12,13,90,286/- under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994(the Act) as well as int....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... well. He submits that the matter needs to be remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication in view of the error in his finding. It is also his submission that an amount of Rs.6.5 lakhs was erroneously confirmed against the appellant. This amount was found due on charges for detailed billing, cancellation of SIM cards and for providing fancy numbers. He submits that these are not exigible to....