Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (3) TMI 341

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....P.C. : Not on board. Taken up for admission by consent of both the parties. 2. The question raised in this appeal reads thus : "Whether the CESTAT was justified in reducing the duty liability from Rs. 11,77,971/- to Rs. 8,50,079/- on the ground that the liability cannot be increased in remand proceedings when the increased demand is already covered by the show cause notice?" 3. In thi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onfirming the duty demand to the extent of Rs. 8,50,079/-. On remand, the adjudicating authority passed fresh order on 26-2-2010 confirming the duty liability at Rs. 11,77,971/-. On an appeal filed by the assessee, the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune sustained the order of the adjudicating authority. On further appeal filed by the assessee, the CESTAT by the impugned order dated 16-9-2010 hel....