2011 (3) TMI 341
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r the Respondent. [Order]. - P.C. : Not on board. Taken up for admission by consent of both the parties. 2. The question raised in this appeal reads thus : "Whether the CESTAT was justified in reducing the duty liability from Rs. 11,77,971/- to Rs. 8,50,079/- on the ground that the liability cannot be increased in remand proceedings when the increased demand is already cover....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hether the Assessing Officer was justified in confirming the duty demand to the extent of Rs. 8,50,079/-. On remand, the adjudicating authority passed fresh order on 26-2-2010 confirming the duty liability at Rs. 11,77,971/-. On an appeal filed by the assessee, the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune sustained the order of the adjudicating authority. On further appeal filed by the assessee, the C....
TaxTMI