Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2010 (8) TMI 570

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [Order].  - The appellant (exporter) has filed this appeal against the denial of duty drawback of their supplementary claims by the Commissioner of Customs holding that their claims are barred by limitation under Rule 15 of the Drawback Rules, 1995. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellants (exporters) have filed the shipping bills against their export consignments regularly a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fore me. 3. Heard. 4. The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants submitted that they have filed the shipping bills under Rule 13 of the Drawback Rules, 1995 and as per Rule 13, Duty Drawback is to be sanctioned immediately when the same is put on EDI data. In this case the department has sanctioned short duty drawback on the presumption that the appellants have availed CENVA....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5 are not applicable to this case and the impugned order holding that the claim is barred by limitation under Rule 15 of the said Rule is to be set aside. 5. On careful examination of the submission made by the learned Advocate, I find that it is a case of whether the duty drawback claim was sanctioned to the appellants and whether the provisions of Rule 15 of the said Rules are applicable t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) - 2004 (172) E.L.T. 145 (S.C.) and Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur v. Flock (India) Pvt. Ltd. - 2000 (120) E.L.T. 285 (S.C.) but instead of challenging the said assessment, the appellants chose to file supplementary claim in form Annexure-III under Rule 15 and the Commissioner has dealt with that supplementary claim holding that as per....