2010 (5) TMI 509
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... for the Appellant. Shri R.K. Verma, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, President (Oral)]. - Heard the ld. Advocate for the appellants and ld. DR for the respondent. The appellants challenge the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Bhopal on 19th October, 2009, whereby the appeal filed by the appellants has been dismissed. The said appeal was f....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re found to be not satisfying the requirement of food items. As said expressions understood in common parlance, show cause notice dated 16th Jan, 2008 came to be issued to the appellants which was contested by the appellants' without success. 3. The finding arrived at by the authorities below on the basis of analysis of records, prime facie discloses that the products in question comprise ....
TaxTMI