2011 (2) TMI 19

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er of the Commissioner (A) No. 505/2010 dated 27.10.2010.   2. Heard both sides.   3. The respondent claims to have paid excess service tax adopting 12% rate during the period July,2005 to March, 2006, when the rate of tax was only 10%. The excess paid amount amounting to Rs. 1,76,083/- stands adjusted by them while paying service tax for the month of August, 2006. The original authori....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gn agents as deemed service provider.   4. The Ld. SDR submits that the order of the Commissioner (A) holding that prior to 01.03.07 also the adjustment taken by the respondent should be treated as valid is not legal. He relies on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of BBC World (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CST, New Delhi 2009 (14) STR 152 (Tri.- Del.) and the decision of the Tribunal in the case ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ltd. (cited supra).   5.2 He also submits that since Rule 6 (4A) was introduced in Service Tax Rules on 1.3.07 and since show cause notice has been issued on 9.10.07, the benefit of the said rule should be extended to them. In this context, he relies on the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Mysore Rolling Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE, Belgaum 1987 (28) ELT 50 (S.C.).   6....