TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2010 (8) TMI 272
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....p; Shri S.K. Mall, SDR, for the Appellant. Shri P.M. Dave, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - Being aggrieved with the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) vide which he has allowed the appeals of the respondents, Revenue has filed the present appeal. We have heard Shri S.K. Mall, learned SDR appearing on behalf of the Revenue and ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nufacturers. Revenue visited the factory of M/s. M.G. Textiles on the same date and conducted search and verification. The stock of finished product and raw material were found to be tallying with the Central Excise records. Factory premises of M/s. Shree Narayani Textiles Pvt. Ltd. were not visited. 3. It may be noted here that the factory premises of M/s. Gopi Synthetics and M/s. Omkar Te....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ri P.M. Dave, learned advocate that the appeals of M/s. Gopi Synthetics and M/s. Omkar Textiles were allowed by Commissioner (Appeals) and no further appeal stand filed by the Revenue. 5. He further submits that it is only in the present impugned order, when the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the impugned order in respect of the present respondent that Revenue has challenged the same.....