Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (9) TMI 601

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Notification No. 8/96-C.E., dated 23-7-1996. There was no evidence against the appellant to suggest that the appellant had cleared the goods in such manner. Whenever there was requirement, goods were also cleared in accordance with customers' requirement. Revenue has used oral evidence of Shri Rakesh Kumar and Shri Sunil Kumar to come to the conclusion that the goods were cleared in the cone form. The appellant had grievance before the authority for an opportunity to cross examine these two wit nesses of revenue. But that was not allowed. He submits that appellant's own statement recorded does not speak against the appellant and that should have been considered. The appellant has explained manner of clearance of the goods depending on the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oticed that in the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana, there was no question of law involved. The matter involved in that case being question of fact, revenue's appeal was dismissed. We examined submission of both sides on the light of Tribunal's decision in the case of H.B. Wooltex (P) Ltd. and found the decision had fully based on the evidence recorded. Evidence being weighing consideration in that case, we have looked present case on the basis of material on records. 4. There is no material on record to suggest that the statements recorded from Shri Rakesh Kumar and Shri Sunil Kumar going against the appellant, is impeachable in absence of any allegation of mala fide when the appellant submits that statement reco....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... M/s. Tushar Textiles, Muradnagar (Prop. Rakesh Kumar), M/s. Aarti Handloom (Owned by Sh. Subhash Chandra elder brother of Rakesh Kumar), M/s. Aarti Textile (Owned by Atul Garg, Nephew of Rakesh Kumar), M/s. Shlvam fabric (Owned by Smt. Sunita W/o Younger Brother of Sh. Rakesh Kumar), M/s. Sumitra Textile (Partner are Ashok Kumar, brother of Rakesh Kumar and his wife Sumitra Dcvi) and M/s. International Fabric (Owned by Sunil Kumar, younger brother of Sh. Rakesh Kumar), all located in Muradnagar. Sh. Rakesh Kumar further clarified that the Cotton yarn was purchased by the aforesaid mills from various yam manufacturers of Panipat including M/s. KKSPL. Further, the yarns purchased and received by all aforesaid Mills were always in the cone fo....