2009 (9) TMI 600

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....llant. Ms. Sudha Koka, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per: P. Karthikeyan, Member (T)]. - M/s. PSCC Pole Centre, APCPDC Ltd. manufactures PSCC Poles falling under Chapter sub-heading No. 6807.90 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 for captive consumption. During the period from 1-7-2000 to 31-3-2005, the assessee cleared PSCC poles manufactured discharging duty based on their cost of pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... demand was imposed on APCPDC under Section 11AC of the Act. 2. Vide the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) sustained the demand of duty, interest as well as penalty imposed. The appellants have challenged the impugned order. They submitted that they had submitted periodical returns and the demand of differential duty invoking longer period of limitation was not sustainable. As they had....