Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1990 (9) TMI 325

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Revenue is the petitioner in both these tax revision cases. The respondent is the same assessee, in both the cases. The revisions relate to the assessment years 1976-77 and 1979-80. The Revenue prays for revising the common order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal for the above two years dated 18th December, 1986. The respondent/assessee is a dealer in arecanut. The respondent is also mak....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..../assessee was doing business in arecanut on its own and as a commission agent of nonresident principals. The respondent/assessee purchased the goods and despatched them to the non-resident principals. Arecanut is liable to be taxed in the State on the last purchase point. As soon as the purchases were made and despatched to the non-resident principals, the deal by the assessee was complete. The pu....