Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1990 (9) TMI 325

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by K.S. PARIPOORNAN, J.-The Revenue is the petitioner in both these tax revision cases. The respondent is the same assessee, in both the cases. The revisions relate to the assessment years 1976-77 and 1979-80. The Revenue prays for revising the common order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal for the above two years dated 18th December, 1986. The respondent/assessee is a dealer in arec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s fairly clear that the respondent/assessee was doing business in arecanut on its own and as a commission agent of nonresident principals. The respondent/assessee purchased the goods and despatched them to the non-resident principals. Arecanut is liable to be taxed in the State on the last purchase point. As soon as the purchases were made and despatched to the non-resident principals, the deal by....