Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1987 (8) TMI 420

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and the Central Sales Tax Act by the assessee against the Tribunal's order dated 31st May, 1986. Both are disposed of together by a combined order. Let me take up first the revision relating to the U.P. Sales Tax Act. The assessee contended that no sale within U.P. was effected during this year. As the manufacturing account was not maintained by the assessee, engaged in the business of manufact....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng this year. No doubt, the initial onus is on the assessee to show that no sale was made within U.P. during the year. But the question is how this onus is to be discharged. For establishing a negative fact, no evidence need be adduced. When the assessee denied the factum of U.P. sales, the onus was shifted to the Revenue to disprove the contention of the assessee and that not having done, the ....