Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (12) TMI 823

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent. ORDER The appellant manufacture various models of Bicycles and its parts chargeable to Central Excise Duty under sub-heading 8712.00 and 8714.00 respectively. They have a unit (Unit-I) at Hero Nagar, G.T. Road, Ludhiana and Unit-II at Plot No. 8, Site IV, Industrial Area, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad. M/s. K.S. Munjal Industries (hereinafter referred to as KSM) is another manufacturer of B....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....price at which the bicycles were ultimately sold by Unit II of the Appellant company. It is on this basis that two show cause notices dated 4-6-03 and 26-9-03 were issued to Unit I as well as Unit II of the Appellant company and also to KSM for demand of differential duty amounting to Rs. 1,51,237/- and Rs. 62,667/- respectively for March, 2002 - September, 2002 and October, 2002 - February, 2003 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al dated 8-10-04 upheld the Assistant Commissioner' s order. 1.2 It is against this order of Assistant Commissioner that the present appeal has been filed. 2. None appeared for the Appellant. 2.1 Heard Shri B.K. Singh, Jt. CDR representing the Department who defended the impugned order reiterating the Commissioner (Appeals)'s findings. He emphasised that since the sale has taken place at ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....have been demanded from the appellant by the jurisdictional Deputy/Assistant Commissioner, Ludhiana in whose jurisdiction the short payment had taken place. However, the duty demand in this regard, confirmed by Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise Division - III Ghaziabad, for short payment of duty by Ludhiana Unit of the Appellant, located within the jurisdiction of a different Commissionerate,....