1982 (11) TMI 145
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er section 44(2) of M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), and the Rules made thereunder, the applicant has prayed that the Board of Revenue be directed to state a case and refer the questions of law mentioned in paragraph 13 of the application arising out of the order of the Board in Sales Tax Appeal No. 322-PBR/77 for the opinion of this Court. 2.. The....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssee's firm was not responsible for the unauthorised dealings of Shri Chopra and he did not derive any profit from the said dealings. He, however, held that if taking advantage of the goodwill of the firm its employees had done any business on their own account and this was connived at by the proprietor he must be held responsible for the business. The assessing authority, however, did not accept ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....learned counsel for the applicant contended that the assessment order and the order passed in appeal by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner granting relief to the applicant became final because the department did not prefer appeal from the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner before the Board of Revenue. The Board of Revenue was, therefore, not justified in law in remanding the case for ....
TaxTMI