1980 (8) TMI 185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....adhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the Board of Revenue has referred the following questions of law to this Court for its opinion: "(1) Whether or not the Commissioner was right in refusing to accept the secondary evidence to remove the admitted defects in the C forms produced by the assessee, namely, the omission to mention the number and date of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nished by the assessee in accordance with the provisions of section 8(4) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Commissioner, in exercise of his powers under section 39(2) of the Act, issued a notice to the assessee to show cause why the declarations furnished by him should not be held to be invalid as in those declarations the number and date of registration of the dealers were not mentioned. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aid questions of law to this Court for its opinion. 3.. The learned counsel for the department conceded that in view of the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P. v. Darasha Mancherjee and Sons, Mhow[1981] 47 S.T.C. 251 (F.B.). [Misc. Civil Case No. 308 of 1976 decided on 18th August, 1980 (Indore)], the reference should be answered in favour of the assessee a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....atisfaction of the assessing authority. Denial of such opportunity would mean that even a defect in the declaration arising out of an inadvertent mistake or omission in the declaration could not be cured." 4.. In view of the aforesaid decision it must be held that the Commissioner had erred in holding that any defect in the declarations furnished by the assessee could not be cured. On appeal, the....