2009 (8) TMI 1017

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent. ORDER The appellants filed this appeal against rejection of refund claim of Rs. 91,386/-. Refund was rejected on the ground that the appellants failed to establish that incidence of duty has not been passed to any other person. 2. After hearing both sides and on perusal of the records, it is seen that the appellants cleared Biscuits "Good Day Butter" declaring MRP of Rs....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntum of incidence of duty and the appellant's Depots have been charging different wholesale prices from their wholesale dealers for the same product as discussed above it becomes impossible to arrive at the conclusion that the incidence of duty has not been passed on to the customers in the instant case where duty has been undoubtedly paid on the higher side by mistake while feeding wrong MRP in t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the refund claim on the same ground. On query from the Bench the Learned Advocate submits that no appeal was filed by the Revenue against the said order of the Commissioner (Appeals). I find that the department verified the wholesale price and the wholesale price were not effected by the quantum of central excise duty paid less or more at the time to removal of....