Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1972 (8) TMI 128

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the business of manufacture and sale of bricks. He was assessed to tax on the turnover of bricks under the U.P. Sales Tax Act for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69 at 7 per cent on account of a notification issued under section 3-A of the Act. He filed two separate appeals against the two assessment orders in question. The appeals were to be accompanied by satisfactory proof of the payme....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pplication to the Sales Tax Officer for adjustment of the admitted tax. The appellate authority accepted the petitioner's contention that he was entitled to the adjustment of the refund against the admitted tax. The appellate authority passed an order dated 17th October, 1971, declaring the appeals to be in order. Thereafter, the Sales Tax Officer again agitated the question before the appellate a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iew of the amendment in the law the petitioner was no longer entitled to the refund and, as such, his appeals were defective. The petitioner has challenged this order. He has also challenged the validity of the Amendment Act. So far as the second contention, namely, the one relating to validity of the Amendment Act is concerned, the same must be rejected in view of the decision of this court in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y admitting the appeal was not affected by the change. As held by the Supreme Court in Lakshmiratan Engineering Works Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner[1968] 21 S.T.C. 154 (S.C.)., the question as to whether an appeal is entertainable or not is to be decided when the appeal is first taken up for hearing. Once the appeals were admitted as proper appeals they could not be dismissed on the ground that b....