Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1968 (12) TMI 84

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sessment order dated 5th October, 1968. In that assessment order the Sales Tax Officer included a direction appropriating a sum of Rs. 7,505.25 under section 8-A(4) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act and called upon the petitioner to pay that amount. The petitioner prays for a writ of certiorari against that order. It is now settled law that the provisions of section 8-A(4) are ultra vires. The Sales Tax ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of law proceeding from this Court. One of the reasons given by the Sales Tax Officer is that although the Court had declared section 8-A(4) ultra vires, the provision still continues on the statute book. It is plain that the officer has not appreciated the legal effect of a declaration by this Court that a statutory provision is ultra vires. The result of such declaration is in law to delete that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uents. That again does not justify the action taken by the Sales Tax Officer. If he had no jurisdiction to make the appropriation, it was immaterial that the petitioner had recovered the amount from its customers. As regards the last remaining consideration to which the Sales Tax Officer has adverted, we hold that it was not necessary for the petitioner to have approached this Court in the first i....